An open letter to the denizens of RavenBlack City
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:02 pm
8 September 2024
RavenBlack City
Emotions have been running high this week at the Nightwatch HQ. Our public servants have recently come under fire for the introduction of the “blacklist,” a controversial if well-intentioned operational decision posed by Lt. Everly and approved of by the Commander, as you will see is all a matter of public record.
The blacklist has since then been removed and is now defunct, thanks to the response of concerned citizens who felt that the blacklist was too punitive and not in the interest of a free, empowered society, which has always been the aim of the Nightwatch.
The Nightwatch since its inception has sworn itself to the ideals of enduring liberty and justice. It is a testament to the Nightwatch’s commitment to these ideals that they have listened and heard the vox populi and have taken appropriate action.
Make no mistake: this is a win for the Nightwatch and for the city at large.
While dissension, debate and discussion are in the spirit of the historical Nightwatch charter, penned in 2003 by Archangel, Capadocious, and a list of the founding fathers of our city, and indeed must be celebrated, I am disheartened by the display of what I can only describe as bad faith by two prominent political figures in our city: one Doncey Shadowlight and one Julia Pacherontis.
A member of the CLA until recently, Doncey Shadowlight penned a letter addressed to the members of the Nightwatch demanding the return of the Nightwatch status quo. “Status quo” here means a dying hall and discussions between the Commander and the esteemed Smitsmit to close the halls of the Nightwatch, due to a lack of interest from the society it serves.
Julia Pacherontis and Doncey Shadowlight would have you believe that there is a conspiracy—a “mutiny”—a “takeover” and a “restructure” at the Nightwatch.
I cannot fault them for their ignorance.
By the Shadowlight patriarch’s own admission, due to his own failure, he had considered the CLA defunct. He had not taken an active interest in the Nightwatch or the CLA until he stepped down from his seat as an ambassador, and with others on the board of the CLA, he had allowed the CLA and, by extension, the Nightwatch to stagnate in silence. And indeed, to operate on a shoestring budget, which according to public records equals to a pittance of not even a million coin between Transit Guards.
The House of Pacherontis, according to Julia Pacherontis’s own words, has always had the ability to “pledge a stupid amount of money” to “flush out the NW’s coffers.”
Julia Pacherontis has also stated that she would rather see the Nightwatch close its doors than to see its members attempt to revitalize this organization, all because of two new policies that she disagrees with.
The first policy: To bring the CLA into the Nightwatch HQ in the interest of visibility and transparency.
The second: the now-defunct blacklist.
As a supporter of the Nightwatch, I must regrettably state my disgust, seeing it once again be threatened by paranoia and politics, when all proceedings of the CLA and the NW have been made available for public viewing and public participation.
What is not in the spirit of the Nightwatch is this: abandoning your duty to your city and your lineage as a CLA Ambassador only to return and attempt to sow internal discord in the Nightwatch—a clear political move.
It is not in the spirit of the NW to accept bribes from individuals and lineages whose interest seems to lie squarely in political gain and the maintenance of status quo. Not when the city is changing. Not when voices from your own lineages and clans are here in these halls, attempting to revitalize and re-enliven this institution and the ideals it stands by.
While my lineage does not ascribe to neutrality as a stance, we understand that diversity of voices and representatives in the CLA leads to the city flourishing under several banners. Currently, the CLA members include representatives from my house, Pacherontis, Shadowlight, Lokason, Cuan, Mahorela, Amandine, St John-Adaire-Wolfe, de Draak, the Ferrymen, and one Ohana Fuentes, a new senator.
While my lineage does not ascribe to neutrality as a stance, it is in our best interest to see this city thrive under diversity—which Mr. Shadowlight can attest to, as my husband himself encouraged Mr. Shadowlight to attend and participate in CLA discussions before Mr. Shadowlight stepped down.
The new ambassadors of the HOP and Shadowlight lineages have been invited to partake in discussions on the docket regarding CLA operations, and indeed Mr. Raize Pacherontis is planning on a motion which he will, in the future, present to the CLA docket for votation.
To the Shadowlight and Pacherontis lineages, and indeed all concerned citizens of this city, I have this to say:
If your aim is the promulgation of this institution and the society it serves, then yes: make your voice be heard. Speak to a NW representative about operations. Disagree. Be present.
Mr. Shadowlight, Ms. Pacheronits: if your concern for the NW and this society is sincere, I must urge you to take up the mantle as ambassador to your lineages and to offer your support and coin with no regard for recognition or with the expectation that your coin will buy the Nightwatch’s compliance.
The Nightwatch is the City, and it will not be drowned out and destroyed by politics and paranoia.
The Nightwatch is the City, and this City will not be bought.
Yours in Good Faith,
Robert J. von Nassau-Schiaraffa
CLA Ambassador to the Haus Schiaraffa
RavenBlack City
Emotions have been running high this week at the Nightwatch HQ. Our public servants have recently come under fire for the introduction of the “blacklist,” a controversial if well-intentioned operational decision posed by Lt. Everly and approved of by the Commander, as you will see is all a matter of public record.
The blacklist has since then been removed and is now defunct, thanks to the response of concerned citizens who felt that the blacklist was too punitive and not in the interest of a free, empowered society, which has always been the aim of the Nightwatch.
The Nightwatch since its inception has sworn itself to the ideals of enduring liberty and justice. It is a testament to the Nightwatch’s commitment to these ideals that they have listened and heard the vox populi and have taken appropriate action.
Make no mistake: this is a win for the Nightwatch and for the city at large.
While dissension, debate and discussion are in the spirit of the historical Nightwatch charter, penned in 2003 by Archangel, Capadocious, and a list of the founding fathers of our city, and indeed must be celebrated, I am disheartened by the display of what I can only describe as bad faith by two prominent political figures in our city: one Doncey Shadowlight and one Julia Pacherontis.
A member of the CLA until recently, Doncey Shadowlight penned a letter addressed to the members of the Nightwatch demanding the return of the Nightwatch status quo. “Status quo” here means a dying hall and discussions between the Commander and the esteemed Smitsmit to close the halls of the Nightwatch, due to a lack of interest from the society it serves.
Julia Pacherontis and Doncey Shadowlight would have you believe that there is a conspiracy—a “mutiny”—a “takeover” and a “restructure” at the Nightwatch.
I cannot fault them for their ignorance.
By the Shadowlight patriarch’s own admission, due to his own failure, he had considered the CLA defunct. He had not taken an active interest in the Nightwatch or the CLA until he stepped down from his seat as an ambassador, and with others on the board of the CLA, he had allowed the CLA and, by extension, the Nightwatch to stagnate in silence. And indeed, to operate on a shoestring budget, which according to public records equals to a pittance of not even a million coin between Transit Guards.
The House of Pacherontis, according to Julia Pacherontis’s own words, has always had the ability to “pledge a stupid amount of money” to “flush out the NW’s coffers.”
Julia Pacherontis has also stated that she would rather see the Nightwatch close its doors than to see its members attempt to revitalize this organization, all because of two new policies that she disagrees with.
The first policy: To bring the CLA into the Nightwatch HQ in the interest of visibility and transparency.
The second: the now-defunct blacklist.
As a supporter of the Nightwatch, I must regrettably state my disgust, seeing it once again be threatened by paranoia and politics, when all proceedings of the CLA and the NW have been made available for public viewing and public participation.
What is not in the spirit of the Nightwatch is this: abandoning your duty to your city and your lineage as a CLA Ambassador only to return and attempt to sow internal discord in the Nightwatch—a clear political move.
It is not in the spirit of the NW to accept bribes from individuals and lineages whose interest seems to lie squarely in political gain and the maintenance of status quo. Not when the city is changing. Not when voices from your own lineages and clans are here in these halls, attempting to revitalize and re-enliven this institution and the ideals it stands by.
While my lineage does not ascribe to neutrality as a stance, we understand that diversity of voices and representatives in the CLA leads to the city flourishing under several banners. Currently, the CLA members include representatives from my house, Pacherontis, Shadowlight, Lokason, Cuan, Mahorela, Amandine, St John-Adaire-Wolfe, de Draak, the Ferrymen, and one Ohana Fuentes, a new senator.
While my lineage does not ascribe to neutrality as a stance, it is in our best interest to see this city thrive under diversity—which Mr. Shadowlight can attest to, as my husband himself encouraged Mr. Shadowlight to attend and participate in CLA discussions before Mr. Shadowlight stepped down.
The new ambassadors of the HOP and Shadowlight lineages have been invited to partake in discussions on the docket regarding CLA operations, and indeed Mr. Raize Pacherontis is planning on a motion which he will, in the future, present to the CLA docket for votation.
To the Shadowlight and Pacherontis lineages, and indeed all concerned citizens of this city, I have this to say:
If your aim is the promulgation of this institution and the society it serves, then yes: make your voice be heard. Speak to a NW representative about operations. Disagree. Be present.
Mr. Shadowlight, Ms. Pacheronits: if your concern for the NW and this society is sincere, I must urge you to take up the mantle as ambassador to your lineages and to offer your support and coin with no regard for recognition or with the expectation that your coin will buy the Nightwatch’s compliance.
The Nightwatch is the City, and it will not be drowned out and destroyed by politics and paranoia.
The Nightwatch is the City, and this City will not be bought.
Yours in Good Faith,
Robert J. von Nassau-Schiaraffa
CLA Ambassador to the Haus Schiaraffa