<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
How to Play Consensus Gentium wrote:Consensus Gentium is to decide on what is true or right based on a general agreement among the masses.
That will be the goal of this section: weighing over and wrestling with various topics until a general conclusion can be reasonably drawn by a majority.
When a question/topic is put forth to discuss* it will be open for ten days of debate before closing. Once closed there will be a three day voting period to determine the consensus gentium.
While readers are encouraged to participate in the comments section below, we will also be allowing for anonymous discussion**. Opinions submitted anonymously will be posted by staff as such in order to add them to the conversation. Voting will be submitted privately, with results posted publicly. Any topic/question put forth will be shelved for 6 months once it is decided on after which it can be resubmitted for debate again.
*Suggest a topic/question anonymously here: THE PLACE
**Submit an opinion anonymously here: THE OTHER PLACE
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
HOBOY. It's been a while. That's fine. Now you have all the words saved up, and good, because we're gonna need them. Our next debate is something that's been suggested as a topic by a number of citizens. Conversation has been minimal while judgement and gossiping has been plentiful. Well - out with it folks!
Should newer citizens, lacking in powers and city experience, be treated the same as any elders?
Yep. It’s a rude question. Rude, but also not as straightforward as some might say. The debate doesn’t rest in personhood, but rather where do they fit in appropriately. Should they be able to freely start new ventures, own/run establishments, start clans, marry/date fully powered elders, marry/date their teachers, partake in combat? Should there be a line, should there be exclusion and, if so, in what way?
Every opinion counts here.