Ab Antiquo

((Only edited to try and end the poll early myself))

Uhm, what?

At no point did the "entertain, provoke, and inform" option in the debate include lying or muddling facts and that wasn't an answer you presented at the end of it or I would have raised issue with it then.

Liander wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 22, 2020 12:56 pm

Uhm, what?

At no point did the "entertain, provoke, and inform" option in the debate include lying or muddling facts and that wasn't an answer you presented at the end of it or I would have raised issue with it then.

It is disappointing that I've upset you, but at this point in the polling I would say that if I've misrepresented this debate I look forward to a redo when it's able to be debated again. I rely on feedback, which stopped about nine days ago and left me with doubt rather than assurance. In the silence, I went freewheeling. I agree now, getting to look at it from your point of view, that if I'm going to borrow words I should use them as they are intended and not go cutting and pasting them together like an anonymous stalker letter.

It is my opinion that the poll should stand, even with it's mistakes, since it has already begun to gather votes. Despite that, I also believe this column is meant to be a representation of mass opinion and mass opinion should supersede my own. If at least 4 people agree to restarting the poll, I will trash it and put it up again with the previously proposed opinions from the 15th. Liander, you are welcome to cast the first vote in favor of a redo.

Here would be what the new poll, with corrections, look likes:

• To deliver information, as free from partiality as they can make it.

• To entertain, provoke, and inform in order to spark activity and discussion.

• To be true to their purpose in whatever they are writing: news should be done straight and columns should be personal, etc.

• Get it right and make it worth our time.

• I do not think any of these answers are a good fit.

I officially motion for a redo.

Liander wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:27 pm

I officially motion for a redo.

Yeahhhh, seconded. That option confused the hell out of me. It was like a mix of Sartori's and Li's ideas.

Still though, Joy - this whole idea has been amazing, and I appreciate you for doing it. I can't wait to see the next one.

A redo would make sense - for the sake of staying true to the opinion shared.

Redo makes the most sense.

Your votes have been heard and your will be done! I will make a new poll. I'm glad to be able to do right by the people, even if it took two shots.

Locking this so there's no confusion with NewPoll!

New poll is here: viewtopic.php?f=43&t=2296